Sermon: Absolute Proof of Christianity

The fact that the more learned a Christian is the more likely they are to convert to Judaism, while the less learned a Jew is the less likely he is to convert to Christianity. that should tell a smart person everything they need to know everything non this subject.

If anybody wants any one of his comical proofs debunked please reply to this post with the verse or contact me.

I was gonna write a short rebuttal but there are so many mistakes in this presentation but half the way i already had so many bullet points listed I had to stop.

Praise God Christian apologists are so terrible no Jew that so much as reads Hebrew will ever convert to Christianity. More Christians convert to Judaism then Jews convert to Christianity and converting to Christianity is EASY!!

Wow what an idiot. Watching a Christian try to defend Christianity from the TaNaKh is like watching a child get molested and you can't stop it!

pastor jeff please pray for me please right now im feeling scared and lost and idk what to do anymore please

Zzz. Zzz.zzz. "Iam" off to watch paint dry.

Dumbass trying to justify myths to gullible people, study some science reason and logic, debunks myth every time. There are apologist speakers like this for every faith.

I like Jeff and his work but had to stop at the bit about Orlando. The bible says we shouldn't mourn with these people. The bible says God has given these people up to that behaviour.

Homosexuality is a disgusting sin and we shouldn't tip toe around that as Christians, particularly given the threat it poses to people in the modern era as it is normalised and millions of pounds spent into promoting sodomy.

Why are preachers so scared to speak boldly on this!?

Best wishes to those defending the faith.

Why do you need proof of christianity? Christianity OBVIOUSLY exists. It passed bigoted laws, tries to teach fairy tales in public schools, discriminates against women's rights, and spews hate toward anyone different.

What you need to be providing "proof" for is the invisible god that christians base their unfounded beliefs on, and the ridiculous supernatural claims they make. Until you do THAT, you are simply PRETENDING to know things you do not know.

The only proof you offer in support of Christianity seems to be faith. But what has faith got to do with evidence? Faith is no evidence. Please show me some real evidence that Christianity 100% true.

Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD!

lol this is just pathetic. absolutely 0 evidence presented

Jeff and his ministry are great! Jeff, if you read this, I'd love to do an internship at your church.

I wonder what kind of perverted things this preacher is doing behind the scenes.

Not looking to start a debate or argument .. BUT..nothing happened in Orlando, just as nothing happened in Sandy Hook CT. etc.Aside from that, I agree with  everything else ..Well done !

Is a person that is forced at fault for the things they're forced into ???

This question that I just asked is the one that breaks the whole foundation of Christianity because we are forced to exist and we are forced to do everything that pertains with this existence, and so if a god punishes someone that is forced then that is not fair or righteous to punish someone for what they are forced into. So if your god exists
and if he punishes people for what he forced upon them, then that god is evil and the christian god is not supposed to be evil according to you Christians.

It's easy for the Christians to be the movers and shakers when it was illegal to go outside the Church of England. Also the united states was settled in a period of 100 years. It's true that there were many Christians that came to the new world. But also a huge amount were non Christian and were just searching for gold. Also you forgot to mention that two thirds of the founding fathers were not religious at all. Thomas Jefferson the third president the one who was responsible for the Louisiana Purchase believed that God had abandon us to create other worlds. Plus other movers and shakers Napoleon, The Japanese, Hitler... All of whom rejected Christianity. All of Asia, the middle east, Rome had beautiful art and culture they advances in reasoning and science. long before the Europeans introduced christ to them. Rome and Greece created democracy and as I am aware they are the one responsible for killing Jesus... The fact the universities started with a christ centered curriculums isn't a good argument... Oxford... Again Church of England problem.... But isn't funny that
their were professors who didn't believe in God when the university started. Like Antony Garrard Newton Flew... Duh! Also so much circler logic... God is real cuz he says he God is real because Petter said he is... What a stupid argument at the end... You can have morals without being religious. You morn for peoples lives memories. families...you. Look I can make ridiculous arguments too look... God isn't real because why would someone who god created go off and kill so many people. If the holy ghost moves through everyone it should be impossible for someone to do something so awful... Plus no one in the audience buys what you are saying you have to keep hyping them.

Durbin's approach to a reasoned defense of Chrsitianity: It's all true because we're going to assume it's true.

Presuppositionalist twaddle that anyone of any belief could engage in and "conclude" that their belief is true. Argue all day with a pressupper and the ONLY thing they will put on the table are a bunch of claims that they can explain this or that but they never actually explain anything, they just assert they can explain it or that their deity can explain it. It's nothing more than a smoke and mirrors con-man trick. Although, it's admittedly the only avenue they have left when traditional apologetics fails them. I guess any grasping for any straw no matter what will suffice for some.

Jeff please do one speak about the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

Just in case some people don't want to wait 27 minutes for him to get to the point. He's trying the argument from morality - yeah I know, pathetic.

We know not to eat each other because our species would've never survived up to this point if we did.

We're a tribal & social species. We don't need Devine revelation that eating each other wouldn't be the most efficient thing to do to preserve our species.

That is a weak argument.